Sequential art has had its superstars through the generations. Walter Kelly and Pogo. Al Capp and LiÌl Abner. Charles Schulz and Peanuts. I could go on and on, and no doubt youÌre hoping I wonÌt, which makes continuing all the more attractive. Sweet, sweet continuing.
Still, since the late seventies, there has been one comic strip that has consistently topped peoplesÌ recognition lists. It is one of the most popular comic strips ever, with dozens of compilation books in print, a highly regarded and still re-run television series in its history, and a major motion picture in the can. Surely, no one can deny the powerful addition to both our cultural heritage and the development of the sequential art form that Garfield, by Jim Davis (et al) has produced.
ThatÌs what makes an essay like this so difficult to write. It was one thing to write about webcomics that had me and ultimately lost me. I mean, by definition, everything on my webcomics list has only been part of my life since the mid-nineties or after. I invest a good amount of emotional attachment into comics I like, but still -- thatÌs just a few scant years. Garfield, on the other hand, has been a part of my reading experience since the seventies. ThatÌs most of my reading life, if you think about it.
Still, if someone is to be true to themselves, they have to accept when the magic leaves. They have to know when the time comes that they canÌt deny it any longer. They have to let former friends go. And thatÌs where we are now. You have to accept the truth of this.
Garfield started with great promise and above all, a sense of consistency that bordered on the pathological. Not content to leave the evolution of his characters to chance or the variances of artistic temperament, GarfieldÌs creator (Jim Davis -- a veteran cartoonist of such notable features as Tumbleweeds) took the extra time and effort to bring experts in the field in, to consider all angles. The very selection of the cast was weighed for the broadest possible appeal and the greatest marketability. Davis knew, confidentially, that artistic merit would follow.
And so it did. I hardly need to sell you on that point. On June 19, 1978, Garfield premiered. Its premise was rock solid. Jon Arbuckle promised to have no thoughts but our entertainment. Garfield, comedically, was only interested in being fed. This of course also meant that from the very beginning, the fourth wall was sundered, the very first joke metahumor. And as long time readers know, thereÌs nothing like metahumor to form my opinions and catch my interest.
The strip began mostly as a comic about a cat, with the foibles of cats a primary theme. However, that didnÌt last long -- the universality of cats was eclipsed by the universality of Jon Arbuckle as a geek. Perhaps that should have been considered the first warning sign, but still -- comedy gold was being mined. Garfield, as it worked out, liked lasagna. He didnÌt like Mondays. He was overweight, and somewhat less active than Jon might have liked. The strip practically wrote itself (with help from Davis, an editorial staff and a focus group, of course).
And the cast expanded, but did so in a very safe way. You see, one of the most dangerous traps that a comic strip can fall into is continuity -- the idea that fans of the strip should possibly have to know what happened yesterday to get tomorrowÌs joke. It was continuity that ultimately destroyed LiÌl Abner after a too-short run of just forty-three years, and continuity of course clung like barnacles to Peanuts, reducing the appeal of what was otherwise a promising little strip. Davis fully understood the dangers of continuity to begin with, and set a solid promise that every strip would be essentially self contained. You would never need to know anything -- not one single, solitary thing -- to read a Garfield strip.
It was a noble goal, but after time, Davis began to waver, and ultimately to crack. He succumbed to the temptation, and went for a Diff'rent Strokes Syndrome attempt.
Long time readers know from the DiffÌrent Strokes Syndrome, but just in case let me run over the entire thing in excruciating detail. DiffÌrent Strokes was a television program that ran during the eighties, most notably starring Todd Bridges and Conrad Bain. In this television program, the essential thesis was put forward (so eloquently in the words of TVÌs Alan Thicke, I swear to Christ IÌm not kidding) that the world donÌt move to the beat of just one drum. What might be right for you, may not, in fact, be right for some. Say a man is born -- heÌs a man of means. Then along come two -- they got nothing but their jeans. But they got diffÌrent strokes -- and it takes diffÌrent strokes to move the world.
You see the appeal for cartoonists, of course. In the bridge, we learn that everybodyÌs got a special kind of story -- everybody finds a way to shine. It donÌt matter that you got not a lot. I mean, so what. TheyÌll have theirs, and youÌll have yours, and I, in fact, will have mine. And together weÌll be fine.
To the artistic committee unburdened by continuity, the siren song is potent. If we bring in more -- different characters, we can create ongoing and lasting artistic stories of significant evolution. And so they bring in two, with nothing but their jeans, and a considerable quantity of dog slobber.
Lyman and Odie were introduced, and Garfield would never be the same.
Lyman was JonÌs old friend. Odie was LymanÌs inordinately stupid dog. The pair moved in and began to get involved, and relationships began to form. Dynamics began to spike. Garfield and Odie developed a certain dynamic. Lyman and Garfield another. Jon and Lyman still a third. The reader began being unduly challenged to remember what happened before.
And once the writer dips his big toe into the pool of continuity and diversity of characters, itÌs hard not to belly-flop all the way in. Garfield got a collection of stuffed animals and rubber chickens -- Stretch and Pooky. (What is it with stuffed bears named Pooky and the ÏYou Had Me and You Lost MeÓ list? I suspect deeper level mimetics at work.) He got a girlfriend with an unfeasably long neck named Arlene. He got a foil named Nermal -- an eternal kitten (putting one in mind of Arnold -- a minor character on DiffÌrent Strokes itself who oddly never seemed to grow up or get taller) who often got sent to Abu Dhabi. A large number of spiders and mice, with whom he began to form ever increasingly complex relationships. Jon developed a family -- a mother and father who work a farm, a grandmother who rides a Harley -- and object of his lust, most notably GarfieldÌs vet.
But more about them later. By now, you can see the warning signs, so let me just confirm what you already suspect: having gone for the full on DiffÌrent Strokes Syndrome, Davis and his committee fell headlong into Webster Syndrome.
You remember Webster Syndrome, of course. Having gone for beat of different drums, right for some, men of means, jeans and all from before, sometimes you just end up an overweight white ex football player who adopts a knockoff height challenged chubby cheeked black kid who lacks memorable lyrics in his theme music. I clearly donÌt need to go into detail how this applies to Garfield.
Davis, drunk on continuity, finally turned his attention away from Garfield to create U.S. Acres, a continuity laden strip (also known as OrsonÌs Farm for those of you who donÌt think ÏU.S.Ó is a good thing to put on a strip title). His committee, left to their own devices, found themselves foundering in a morass of complexity and -- perhaps worst of all -- emotional resonance.
The problem with Webster Syndrome is once youÌre in it, you try to shove the fat little black kid back into his bottle. (Now that IÌve managed to give all of you the mental image of Emmanuel Lewis dressed like Jeannie from I Dream of Jeannie, my work here is done.) You try to minimize continuity, and go back to the zenlike state you had before. Unfortunately, continuity isnÌt so easy to get rid of, and of course it can lead to ever spirally traps. The very first of those traps were sprung when controversy settled over Lyman.
You remember Lyman. Curly black hair. A rather suspect mustache. A tendency to wear either turtlenecks or kitschy Hawaiian shirts. Living in an ill-defined relationship with another man. Jim Davis denied the rumors that inevitably started up, but come on -- this was the 1980Ìs. The core code was there. We knew what Lyman was supposed to be.
And there was no place for a womanizing Republican on the comics page. Not then, and not now.
Come on, look at Lyman, and look at Tom Selleck. (T.V.Ìs Magnum, I would add.) TheyÌre practically a match. And look at their respective roles. Magnum lived with another man, name of Higgens, who actually controlled the house (ownership being vested elsewhere). He got dragged into adventures with beautiful women or in matters of National Security. This was Lyman all over, and there was just so long people were going to stand for it.
Needless to say, Lyman disappeared. But Odie, inexplicably, stayed. LymanÌs disappearance was never fully elaborated upon (though Steve Troop did a journeymanÌs job of fanfic-style reconciliation in his own Melonpool. My hat is off to him). My personal theory is Lyman was on a case and, having successfully romanced two women and crashing the Ferrari, he reupped in the United States Navy to give his newly discovered daughter a stable home environment -- since the best possible career choice for a single parent with a four year old daughter he never knew he had would be one that caused said parent to sail out to sea for months at a time.
However, those are just conjectures. A hole had been made in the ever growing continuity, and the cracks would radiate from it. The committee, still floundering without solid artistic direction while Davis pursued stories of pigs and chicks still in their shell, focused their attentions elsewhere -- Jon ArbuckleÌs courtship of Dr. Liz Wilson... GarfieldÌs vet.
Romance, especially a hapless, doomed one between a woman in white and a man in contrasting strips and plaids, is the surest signpost in the broader community that is Webster Syndrome. This artful blend of pathos and slapstick has its share of chuckles -- oh, donÌt get me wrong on that account -- but the tortured subtextual message is utterly at contrast with what made Garfield great in the first place. Oh sure, if one looks at the purely superficial, one can see jokes about nerds and haplessness, but if thereÌs one thing weÌve learned, is that the surface is nothing -- itÌs the message, and clearly DavisÌs committee has elected to metaphorically reenact the epic love and struggle between Siegfried and Brunhylde from the Ring Cycle by Wagner -- the fire that Siegfried must walk through to clasp his love to him metaphorically represented by the sarcasm Liz feeds back to him. To be any clearer, one would have to shove a coaxial cable into LizÌs eye socket and broadcast it on television -- not that the Committee hasnÌt considered that.
It got to be too much for me. It really did. I mean, I was old school with Garfield. In the old days, he spoke to me. I like lasagna. I didnÌt like Mondays. I was fat and lazy. I was owned by a sardonic and cynical owner named Jon. These are common to the human condition, damn it. Now? Now I feel like I need CliffÌs Notes to follow along. ÏDoc Boy?Ó ÏBinky the Clown?Ó ÏIrma?Ó Slow this train down kids!
To his credit, Davis clearly recognizes this. He left the continuity-strewn fields of U.S. Acres behind, electing instead to accept an assignment to produce Mister Potatohead, a comic strip so bereft of expectation or assumption that you didnÌt even need familiarity with the childÌs toy. With that stripÌs end, he found himself fully in the thick of the morass of subtext and metareference, fourth-wall fracture and insight-laden metaphor that is Garfield.
I think heÌs trying. I really do. YesterdayÌs strip, where Garfield notes that he, unlike you, can always get what he wants, demonstrating by eating an entire cake in one gulp, shows that. But itÌs a desperate gasp. In GarfieldÌs forced smile in the third panel, you know that heÌs thinking of how his relationship with Arlene is echoed in Jon and LizÌs continued tempestuous path. You can tell that he too wonders what happened to Lyman, and how Nermal keeps getting back from Abu Dhabi. You can see the frayed edges of so many plot ends left untied, so many metaphors and metareferences left unexplained. He is burdened with decades of tortured cruft and backstory, and thereÌs just no way I can possibly continue on.
Sometime, in the next few weeks, Garfield will hate Monday. Sometime, Garfield will express his love of lasagna. Sometime, Garfield will be disinclined to move when Jon wishes him to.
But heÌll do it without me. He had me... and he lost me.
Seriously, dude. Alan Thicke wrote the theme to DiffÌrent Strokes. I wouldnÌt lie about that.
From Garfield
(From General Protection Fault.)
(From It's Walky.)
From